Out of curiosity, why do you guys still use FORTRAN?

所有跟贴·加跟贴·新语丝读书论坛

送交者: steven 于 2009-10-27, 12:30:05:

回答: 请推荐各个学科经典著作，比如统计昏上还要您老把关由 Nixrreg 于 2009-10-27, 12:24:46:

unless you have legacy code, or something very specific, I don't see why you need FORTRAN.

所有跟贴:

行业不同，用的语言也不同。经济学领域不知为什很多人用 (无内容) - Nixrreg (0 bytes) 2009-10-27, 12:35:10 (377579)
- No, that is not what I was asking. - steven (558 bytes) 2009-10-27, 12:49:11 (377587)
  - 另外说什么fortran快都是扯蛋，再快能快一倍吗？根本不值． (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2009-10-27, 13:45:03 (377621)
    - 要是与脚本语言比，快一倍不止 - 疫苗 (203 bytes) 2009-10-27, 20:45:21 (377699)
  - 有时候用c算一小时的事，matlab要吭哧一天 - 008 (114 bytes) 2009-10-27, 13:02:21 (377597)
    - You will always find something like this, that's why those - steven (243 bytes) 2009-10-27, 13:17:31 (377603)
      - hook哪些行，函数调用都要超过10毫秒 - 008 (162 bytes) 2009-10-27, 13:42:56 (377619)
        
        It will take time for software to be mature, however - steven (91 bytes) 2009-10-27, 13:53:54 (377625)
i heard fortran is fast, very fast - easy to optimize due to no pointers (无内容) - meiyou (0 bytes) 2009-10-27, 12:31:52 (377576)
- fortran actually has pointers since fortran 90. (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2009-10-27, 12:40:42 (377582)
  - it is the way pointer being allowed to be used that makes the difference - meiyou (1861 bytes) 2009-10-27, 12:50:03 (377588)
    - I am not so sure about the correctness of this. - steven (398 bytes) 2009-10-27, 13:13:16 (377600)
      - after C99 introduced the 'restrict' key word, - meiyou (76 bytes) 2009-10-27, 13:19:33 (377606)
        
        there are: - steven (144 bytes) 2009-10-27, 13:44:20 (377620)
        
        Just from the language feature point of view, fortran is a less flexible - meiyou (378 bytes) 2009-10-27, 14:09:14 (377633)
        
        I thought the fastest computing language is always the assembly. :) (无内容) - steven (0 bytes) 2009-10-27, 14:28:22 (377641)

加跟贴